Ways I have contributed to the learning of others:

I have responded to Jamie's Blog.  I am very interested in her topic and shared what I learned at the NEA-Alaska conference.  The theme of the conference was "Bridging the Gap" and that relates perfectly to Jamie's topic.

I also have been following and responding to Scott's blog regarding the use of technology.  I have to admit because of it I have been looking for more engaging technology for my kindergarten classroom.

My biggest challenge continues to be looking at my research in a qualitative way instead of quantitaitvely.  I find myself, even at this stage wanting to measure my results to something.  I remind myself that, as I do every day, in a much more informal way, I am doing qualitative research!

Steps I have taken to further my learning:

This week I have looked at the Youtube video link regarding APA style.  I have re-read our final paper rubric as well as read through the sample paper posted.  I have also finished the textbook Qualitative Research by Sharan B. Merriam.  I gave word clouds a chance and created one through WordItOut.  

This week my main focus is to focus on the rubric and my APA style handbook as I continue to write my paper. I will refer to the texts Qualitative Research and Action Research by Craig A. Merler I will attend our last WebX meeting on Tuesday and Twitter on Thursday.


 
This week:

     I hosted Tuesday's Tweet session.  This was a lot of fun.  I've come a long way from not even knowing what a tweet was only a couple of months ago!  I can now navigate myself around TweeDeck!

     I bought and downloaded a new app, "Too Loud".  This was mentioned in someone's blog I read last week. Sorry, I do not remember who it was, but THANK YOU!   It works wonders in my classroom.

     I opened my classroom to my principal for her to practice with our new teacher evaluation tool, iObservation.  She came in and observed for 15 minutes and entered her data directly into the computer.  She submitted it and we both looked at the results.  It is a great program and I look forward to this new method of receiving valuable feedback.  The old model was not very useful.

     I think I can honestly say I am starting to see the light at the end of the tunnel.  The step-by-step process has made this overwhelming project more manageable. I have learned a lot.  For one I have increased my technological vocabulary: Word clouds, Twitter, Weebly, TweetDeck, Survey Monkey to name a few.

This week:  I plan to continue writing my paper and I hope to use some of the technology mentioned by my classmates to illustrate my data.  I have only just written my results in narrative form.

What I have learned though my PLN:  I still have much more to research as we continue with Writer's Workshop throughout the year.  My grade-level team as well as my principal are very interested in my results.








 
As I sit and continue the process of drafting my paper this weekend, I find I continue to have many questions.

I am extremely thankful for the resources posted by our instructors and by classmates.  It has helped me to create an outline for my paper.  I can now be more focused and concise.  

I am thankful for more responses to my questionnaire. This will allow me to continue to analyze the results.  It has also given me many more questions.  

The beginning of kindergarten moves very slowly.  The first couple of months we work on expectations and behaviors.  For many students this is their first experience in a school environment.  The writing program put in place to support our New Alaska Standards has helped to establish expectations in both student behavior as learners and how they properly use the tools in the classroom.  I will need much more time and experience with the program as the year progresses to see if it is an effective program to support our new standards.  My paper will then focus on its use so far in the school year.  I will look at a few of the writing standards and show its efficacy.

This week I hope to get over my reluctance to use the technology mentioned in our Tweet sessions and in blog posts to present


 
This week's data collection was much more successful.  I sent out a survey to my kindergarten grade-level team, 10 teachers, via SurveyMonkey.  The first week got one reply.  This week I received 7 more.  (Coffee bribes seemed to have done the trick.)  Eight out of 10 pretty good rate of return.  Honestly, I was hoping for 100% participation.  I have read through the responses that are very nicely organized with SurveyMonkey.  I have also had further conversations with my colleagues regarding my subject of research.  Many are interested in my study and have suggested a continued look into its success as we go through the school year.  Some also mentioned the inability to answer my questions fully as it is so new and we are only 8 weeks in.  I asked for their responses to reflect upon the program to this point in the year.

I participated in both Tweet sessions this week hoping to glean some insight as to this next step in the project.  I feel like I have been limping along at this point with a project that I have absolutely no experience.  The next step is even more daunting.  Research is something I do everyday as a teacher.  It has always been informal through observation and trial and error.  I am finding the process, thus far, to be interesting and I am excited to have piqued the interest of my fellow teachers with my project.  I am most interested in the efficacy of programs new to our district. I hope to be able to complete this project with some success.

My goal this week is to continue to analyze and organize my data and review resources made available through our class site. 
 
What am I finding as I collect data?


Well, this week is not the week to begin to collect data. Our district has just sent out a pretty important survey regarding a Strategic Plan for 2014-2015.  We also attended a two day inservice presented by SERRC South East Regional Resource Center. The topic presented was The Art and Science of Learning.  We are implementing a standards based model of instruction and grading, using the Marzano learning map.


My focus group, my grade-level team was my target audience to interview.  I have not yet received a completed survey.  I did speak briefly to a few of them at inservice and hope for some data to arrive soon, via my survey monkey.


This weekend I am attending NEA Alaska's Fall Event 2013 in Anchorage.  This year's theme is "Building Bridges for a Brighter Tomorrow."  Much of the current legislation is being discussed and ideas for parent and community collaboration.  I am learning so much!  

I look forward to getting feedback from my survey as I continue with this learning process.
 
This week's assignments have been a little confusing to me.  I first submitted my proposal on Friday and invited Scott and Chris to view it for peer review.  I then withdrew it as an assignment pending the reviews.  I received one review, thank you Scott, and made small adjustments to my assignment  before I resubmitted it for assessment.  I appreciate the extension on the deadline to 9 am Monday, but I cannot stay up any later to wait for my second review.

I have also been looking for invitations for proposals to be reviewed.  I have not received one.  

Is anyone else feeling that they need to have this week to work on this step in the process?  I feel like I need more time to read my reviews and make the changes necessary before assessment.  I would also like to be able to have the time necessary to put into writing my two reviews.

I am also greatly appreciative for the extension for our final project.  I hope to stay on the schedule we first were given but, I can see the need for extra time in cases such as this week's assignments.  

I would love to hear from the rest of the class as to how they are feeling about this week.
 
This week's learning curve for me was to focus on the research method.  How did I want to go about answering the questions I have?  The Twitter session discussions have been extremely helpful for me.  My focus is not on student success or growth, my research focus is on the effectiveness of a new program added to our district.  I am looking at this as it relates to our New Alaska ELA Standards.  Having the luxury of unlimited time to look at each standard and each writer's workshop lesson as it relates to the standard is not something I, nor any teacher has.  The ability to ask my fellow kindergarten teachers about this new program and how they see its effectiveness in the classroom is priceless.  I am prepared to hear information from them that I may not even have considered.  I would like to continue my research over the rest of the year to effectively create age/grade-appropriate writing workshop lessons for my kindergarten students.

Coming up with focused questions is my struggle.
 
I am researching the effects of the New Alaska State Standards as it pertains to our district's addition to writer's workshop to our literacy instruction.  I believe the best method of collecting data would be through questionnaires to my grade-level colleagues.  I am most interested in how we can best support our kindergarten students through this process.  Is writer's workshop the most efficient way to cover the standards?  Much of my research has found that there are many different ways to implement this program, I guess the biggest question I have is, will the highly scripted program we were given along with specific training have an impact on teaching our students to the new standards?  Or should we be given the freedom to use different aspects of the program and other writing workshop ideas as well as lessons from previous years to fit the needs of our students?


 
Hertz, M. S., & Heydenberk, W. (1997). A kindergarten writing workshop: how kindergarten students grow as writers. Reading Horizons, V37 203-214 Retrieved from EBSCO Host.




This research study focused on many questions regarding the change in teaching writing in kindergarten after an extended focus on teaching reading first.  Questions like:  Can kindergarten students effectively engage in a writing workshop on a sustained basis? How do kindergarten children grow as writers when they are given the opportunity to participate in regularly scheduled process writing activities?  The study was done with a half-day kindergarten class of 19 students over 5 months. The writing workshop format was explained and results were positive.  It referenced, Teale, W., & Martinez, M. (1986) to further explain the connection between reading and writing readiness in kindergarteners.



Lamme, L., Fu, D., & Johnson, J. (2002). Helping Kindergarten Writers Move Toward Independence. Early Childhood Education Journal, 30(2), 73-79.  Retrieved from EBSCO Host.

This study’s goal focuses on developmentally appropriate instruction and helping kindergarten students to become “active, autonomous learners.”   A study by Turner (1985) is cited to support the notion that when students are given the freedom and responsibility for their learning, they are more successful.  The research explains that students should be given choices and flexibility.  This to build confidence in their writing.  The process of moving students from pictures only to pictures and labels and ultimately words, phrases and complete sentences is explained in detail.  Allowing students to make mistakes and to continue writing anyway is a large part of helping student to become successful.  Hertz and Heydenberk (1997),  Referenced in the conclusion of this study emphasizes the need for mini-lessons, examples, support and time in order to help students become successful writers.



Gallant, P. A. (2009). Kindergarten Teachers Speak Out: “Too Much, Too Soon, Too Fast!”. Reading Horizons, 49(3), 201-220.  Retrieved from EBSCO Host.

This study focuses on the push of formal literacy instruction in the kindergarten classroom.  It cites many surveys and questionnaires given to a wide range of experienced kindergarten teachers looking for their feedback as to how these changes are effecting their students.  Concerns about the loss of play-based learning is mentioned throughout.  Discussion about kindergarten readiness as it relates to parent involvement and age tie in the main focus of are these expectations appropriate for five and six year olds.



Hertz, M. S., & Heydenberk, W. (1997). A kindergarten writing workshop: how kindergarten students grow as writers. Reading Horizons, 37 203-214 Retrieved from EBSCO Host.

This study looks at the change of the study of literacy from the 1980s to today.  It looks at the performance and attitudes of kindergartners who are involved in more formal writing instruction.  Using multiple sources and methods it looks at the ability and attitudes of half-day kindergarten students who are engaged in a formal writing workshop.  The process of the writers workshop is outlined and specific areas of student’s writing was evaluated after a five month period.  Students did show measurable growth and recommendations were made as to how this process can be accomplished in a classroom.